Alex is in the Construction team. He does a mixture of contentious and non-contentious work, with a bias towards non-contentious. His clients span a broad range of parties, including contractors, funders, developers, high net-worth individuals and resident management companies.
Alex’s work involves assisting with drafting JCT Building Contracts and appointments, collateral warranties, licences, and various pre-action correspondence, as well as being responsible for managing matters with appropriate supervision.
Experience
Drafting construction documentation in relation to complex residential developments in keeping with the requirements of funding agreements for the projects.
Acting for high-net-worth individuals and funders providing finance for redevelopment high-value private residences, including drafting and negotiating/reviewing appointments of key consultants, drafting collateral warranties and the deeds of security assignment, reviewing key insurances and planning conditions and reporting on the same.
Drafting appointments for various consultants involved in building safety remediation projects funded via the Building Safety Fund and Cladding Safety Scheme.
Drafting and negotiating licences for access for works and scaffolding licences on residential developments and existing residential properties.
Engaging in pre-action correspondence in accordance with the Pre-Action Protocol for Construction and Engineering Disputes, and assisting parties with negotiating settlement of construction-related disputes, including following the required Court procedures.
Alternative dispute resolution, including assisting with adjudication, attending mediations, and assisting with drafting subsequent settlement agreements where appropriate.
Alex's insights
Building Safety Act
Jan 12, 2026
Judicial guidance on defect claims and leaseholder protections under the Building Safety Act 2022
In Almacantar Centre Point Nominee No.1 Ltd & Ors v Penelope de Valk & Ors, on appeal to the Upper Tribunal (UT) from the First Tier Tribunal (FTT), the UT has held that: Proving the existence of a “relevant defect”