Wedlake Bell Insights

    • Article
    • Nov 5, 2024

    Maxima Creditor Resolutions Ltd v Fealy & Anor

    There are three exceptions to the general rule on the use of a prohibited name: (1) use pursuant to a sale or acquisition from the liquidator of the whole, or substantially the whole, of the insolvent company (r 22.4 Insolvency

    More about Maxima Creditor Resolutions Ltd v Fealy & Anor
    • Article
    • Oct 2, 2024

    Dos Santos v Unitel SA

    The appellant, Ms dos Santos, an entrepreneur and daughter of the former President of Angola, founded Unitel SA (Unitel), Angola’s largest mobile telecoms company in 1998. She was a director of the company until August 2020 and the beneficial owner

    More about Dos Santos v Unitel SA
    • Article
    • Jul 15, 2024

    Broom v Aguilar

    Mrs Aguilar, a Spanish national, moved to the UK in 1972 and married Michael Chambers. They lived together in England for more than 40 years until 2014 when they emigrated to Spain, where they continued to live. The couple bought

    More about Broom v Aguilar
    • Article
    • Jul 15, 2024

    Hellard & Ors v OJSC Rossiysky Kredit Bank & Ors

    The judgment of Nicholas Thompsell, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, in Hellard & Ors v OJSC Rossiysky Kredit Bank & Ors [2024] EWHC 1783 (Ch) deals with three questions raised by an application of the trustees in bankruptcy

    More about Hellard & Ors v OJSC Rossiysky Kredit Bank & Ors
    • Article
    • Jul 4, 2024

    Sian Participation Corp v Halimeda International Ltd

    Giving the advice of the board of the Privy Council in Sian Participation Corp (In Liquidation) v Halimeda International Ltd (Virgin Islands)[2024] UKPC 16, Lords Briggs and Hamblen identified the issue in the following terms: “This appeal is about the

    More about Sian Participation Corp v Halimeda International Ltd
    • Article
    • Jul 3, 2024

    Re Consort Healthcare

    Restructuring Plans: should an opposing creditor be granted security for costs? Might that open the floodgates where companies are by definition “distressed,” or was this particular Plan more akin to ordinary adversarial litigation? Read our summary below. Consort Healthcare (Tameside)

    More about Re Consort Healthcare
    • Article
    • May 28, 2024

    Wade & Anor v Singh & Ors [2024] EWHC 1203 (ch)

    Deputy ICC Judge Curl KC’s judgment in Wade & Anor v Singh & Ors [2024] EWHC 1203 (Ch) follows applications by the liquidators of MSD Cash & Carry plc to enforce charging orders over a number of properties owned by

    More about Wade & Anor v Singh & Ors [2024] EWHC 1203 (ch)
    • Article
    • May 17, 2024

    In re a company

    In Re a Company [2024] EWHC 1070 (Ch) was an application to restrain presentation of a petition on five grounds: (1) that the judgment debt was time-barred;(2) that it was unclear if there had been an acknowledgment of the debt

    More about In re a company
    • Article
    • May 17, 2024

    Hellard v Khan

    Phoenix Tech Ltd had carried on business to defraud HMRC by participating in a kind of VAT fraud sometimes called “missing trader intra-community” fraud or “carousel” fraud. It had submitted a VAT return claiming the right to deduct VAT and

    More about Hellard v Khan
    • Article
    • May 3, 2024

    Tonstate v Wojakovski

    In a helpful case on the Bankers Trust jurisdiction Adam Johnson J made an order for disclosure against an Israeli resident, having decided that the court had personal jurisdiction over him as a director of an English company who had

    More about Tonstate v Wojakovski