Wedlake Bell Insights

    • Bulletins
    • Jan 14, 2026

    Thomas Barnes & Sons PLC v Blackburn With Darwen Borough Council

    The claimant company had brought proceedings against a local authority (Blackburn With Darwen Borough Council) in the Manchester Technology and Construction Court seeking damages for wrongful termination of a contract for the construction of a new bus station in Blackburn.

    More about Thomas Barnes & Sons PLC v Blackburn With Darwen Borough Council
    • Bulletins
    • Jan 8, 2026

    Personally liable and the liable person – what the courts said in 2025

    Yerbury v Azets Holdings Ltd [2025] EWHC 757 In Yerbury v Azets, the difference between the individual practitioners and their firm came under the microscope. A lender had appointed Law of Property Act receivers from CLB Coopers. The receivers sold

    More about Personally liable and the liable person – what the courts said in 2025
    • Bulletins
    • Dec 11, 2025

    Economic Outlook Breakfast with HSBC Economist Liz Martins – Key Takeaways

    Strong Start, Emerging Challenges and Labour Market Trends Liz highlighted that the UK recorded the strongest GDP growth among G7 nations in the first half of 2025; a significant rebound after pandemic-induced stagnation and reduced government spending. However, sustaining this

    More about Economic Outlook Breakfast with HSBC Economist Liz Martins – Key Takeaways
    • Bulletins
    • Dec 9, 2025

    Maher & Anor v Investalet Ltd & Anor

    Section 234 Insolvency Act 1986 provides: “(2) Where any person has in his possession or control any property, books, papers or records to which the company appears to be entitled, the court may require that person forthwith (or within such period as the

    More about Maher & Anor v Investalet Ltd & Anor
    • Bulletins
    • Dec 4, 2025

    Rawbank SA v Banfield & Ors

    The first respondents were the existing  joint liquidators of the company, all from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. The basis of the proposed additional appointments (which were opposed) was the investigation of potential claims. Parts of the hearing were held in private because

    More about Rawbank SA v Banfield & Ors